Analisis Tingkat Kognitif pada Butir Soal Asesmen Sumatif Tengah Semester PAI dan Budi Pekerti di SMP Negeri 8 Salatiga

Authors

  • Balqis Najma Negara UIN Salatiga
  • Ida Mustafidatun Nisa' UIN Salatiga
  • Tia FatikaSari UIN Salatiga
  • Sutrisna UIN Salatiga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62490/latahzan.v17i2.1638

Keywords:

Cognitive levels, Islamic Religious Education, Assessment items

Abstract

Evaluation of assessment instrument qualityis a crucial aspect in ensuringthe effectiveness of the learning process in schools, including in the subjects ofIslamic Religious Education (PAI) and Ethics. This study aims to analyze the cognitive level distribution of summative assessment items in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) and Character Education for Grade VII at SMP Negeri 8 Salatiga, focusing on Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). This qualitative research examined 50 test items, consisting of 40 multiple-choice questions and 10 essay questions, classified according to the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy by Anderson & Krathwohl (C1–C6). The analysis revealed an uneven distribution, with 48 items (96%) categorized as LOTS (C1–C3) and only 2 items (4%) classified as HOTS (C4–C5), while no items measured C6 (creating). The predominance of LOTS items indicates that most instruments only assess factual and procedural knowledge, limiting students’ opportunities to develop critical, analytical, and creative thinking skills. This condition suggests that the test construction has not fully accommodated the ideal variation in cognitive levels, which should cover the full spectrum from remembering to creating. The findings emphasize the need to enhance teachers’ capacity to design HOTS-based items, including using simple materials with contextual approaches that encourage idea exploration and problem-solving. In conclusion, balancing LOTS and HOTS in test design is essential to improve the quality of assessment, foster higher-order thinking skills, and support more meaningful and contextual PAI learning for students.

References

Anggraeni, C. D., Yunus, M., & Damayanti, P. (2023). Analisis Soal Latihan pada Buku Soal Fisika Kelas XI berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Dilihat dari Prespektif Higher Order Thinking Skill pada Pokok Bahasan Fluida. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 4(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v4i1.1945

Citra Ilmiah Awaliah, Edisti Aditia, Jakiatun Nupus, Saefudin Dzuhri, & Wahyu Hidayat. (2024). Identifikasi Soal-Soal Hots pada Buku Ajar PAI Kelas 12 SMA Negeri 1 Ciomas. ALFIHRIS?: Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.59246/alfihris.v3i1.1162

Desty Ayu, D., & Realita, R. (2024). ”Analisis Butir Soal pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Kelas V SDN 3 Tanjung Pura.” Alacrity: Journal of Education, 4(3), 140-151. https://lpppipublishing.com/index.php/alacrity/article/download/418/358/1238).

Hasiana, I., & Pitasari, M. A. R. (2025). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. IjoEd: Indonesia Journal on Education.

Hidayati, K., & Nisa’, Z. E. K. (2023). ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL PENILAIAN AKHIR SEMESTER MATEMATIKA. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 3516. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.7575

Hidayat, R., & Rohmawati, B. (2025). “Pengembangan Butir Soal HOTS: Tantangan dan Solusi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Analisis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran PAI.” JUMPER: Journal of Educational Multidisciplinary Research, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.56921/jumper.v4i1.255

Iftirosy, V. A., Ningsih, R., & Sancaya, S. A. (t.t.). Pentingnya Berpikir Kritis dalam Pengambilan Keputusan pada Siswa SMA.

Izzah, A. N., Azizah, S. S. L., Ekawati, R., & Rufiana, I. S. (2025). Eksplorasi Analisis Butir Soal Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas II Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 5(2), 1031–1043. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i2.1064

Jaya, M. T., Rafin, M., Nurrohman, M. M., & Ahmad, A. (2025). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN PAI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL TAKSONOMI BLOOM. Educational Journal: General and Specificc Research.

Lourdusamy, R., Magendiran, P., & Fonceca, C. M. (2022). Analysis of Cognitive Levels of Questions With Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Case Study. International Journal of Software Innovation, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsi.297922

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Muhammad Syawal Karo-Karo, Iqbal Maulana, Syukri Kurniawan Nasution, & Nurmawati. (2025). Analisis Butir Soal Sumatif Akhir Semester Genap PAI Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Di Kelas VI SD Islam Al-Abid. BADA’A: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.37216/badaa.v7i1.2161

Pratiwi, A. B. (2021). PENYUSUNAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS THINKING ANALYSIS DALAM UPAYA PENINGKATAN KOMPETENSI GURU MATEMATIKA. InEJ: Indonesian Engagement Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21154/inej.v2i1.2876

Ravichandran, K., & Virgin B, A. (2024). Bloom’s Taxonomy Categories in the Economy of Literature Teaching-Learning Process. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 05(03), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i03.0827

Rofi’ah, S., & Rokhmaniyah, R. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah pada Mata Pelajaran IPAS kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v7i3.92274

Sholihah, A. M., & Astuti, D. S. (2025). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Pada Soal Buku Teks IPA Kelas VII Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom (Revisi). Bioscientist?: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i1.14911

Siti Ina Mulyani, Umi Syahidah, Salsabila Oktavia, Saefudin Zuhri, & Wahyu Hidayat. (2024). Analisis Kualitas Soal Evaluasi pada Buku Ajar PAI dan Budi Pekerti SMKN 3 Kota Serang. ALFIHRIS?: Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.59246/alfihris.v3i1.1163

Suttrisno, S. (2025). ”Pengembangan instrumen Evaluasi Higher Order Thinking Skills Berbasis Etnosains pada Pembelajaran IPAS Kurikulum Merdeka.” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i2.7118

Ulum, Ö. G. (2022). Is the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited in the EFL/ESL Reading Textbooks? OPUS Toplum Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 19(45), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1062878

Wahyuni, I., Nurisma, A., & Mardiya, R. (2023). Analisis Soal Penalaran Proposional Pada Buku Teks Matematika Siswa Kelas VII Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN DAN MATEMATIKA SIGMA (JPMS), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.36987/jpms.v9i2.4419

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Negara, B. N., Mustafidatun Nisa’, I., FatikaSari, T., & Sutrisna. (2025). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif pada Butir Soal Asesmen Sumatif Tengah Semester PAI dan Budi Pekerti di SMP Negeri 8 Salatiga. La-Tahzan: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 17(2), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.62490/latahzan.v17i2.1638